|
|

  
   |
|
Historisk tidskrift 128:2 • 2008
Innehåll (Contents) 2008:2
Uppsatser (Articles)
Varför inrätta kulturnämnd? Lokal kulturpolitik i två kommuner
Anne-Li Lindgren
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Why establish a local government committee of culture? Cultural
policy in two municipalities.
Since the 1970s most Swedish municipalities have created committees
of culture. The present article investigates negotiations over
cultural policy and conditions of cultural life when local
government committees of culture were established in the cities
of Linköping and Norrköping. The committees were equipped with
different powers in the two cities and the decision to establish
a committee of culture took a few years in Linköping but close
to fourteen years in Nor- rköping.
The establishment of cultural
committees was part of the national cultural policy in Sweden
and local governments responded differently to the issue. Vari-
ations in the responsibilities given to cultural committees
in different cities had consequences for the future. The local
government in Linköping created a com- mittee with limited
powers and thus helped build a national cultural policy from
below. In Norrköping there was strong and lengthy opposition
to the national policy. Thus the investigation shows that there
existed both local acquiescence and strong opposition to the
national cultural policy. The question of centraliza- tion
versus decentralization was given different meaning depending
on the actors’ position in the political system.
The study
shows that in contrast to the national policy cultural institutions
did not always gain from the local cultural policy. In the
political rhetoric, the institu- tions were described as too
traditional and as impediments to change. Local ac- tors who
early on worked to establish committees of culture could later
on assume new positions and carry through the issue. Compared
to the earlier report the question became more politicised.
The Social Democrats strove to establish committees of culture
whereas the other parties registered their reservations. In
Norrköping, the site of a drawn-out and ideologically charged
confl ict, the ques- tion of the role of institutions in the
city’s cultural life became polarized. Further- more, there
was disagreement between the staff and the direction when the
direc- tion fi nally agreed to become part of a committee of
culture. In retrospect, there is reason to criticize the handling
of local cultural policy because it drove apart local actors
rather than bring them together.
Keywords
cultural policy,
citizen participation, devolution, co-operation
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|