|
|
w

  
   |
|
Historisk tidskrift 126:3 • 2006
Innehåll (Contents) 2006:3
Uppsatser (Articles)
Konstitutioner, frihandel och tillväxt i tidigmoderna nordeuropeiska
stadsstater En komparativ institutionell analys av Hamburg och
Lübeck
Erik Lindberg
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Constitutions, Free Trade and Economic Growth. A Comparative
Institutional Analysis of Hamburg and Lübeck in the Early Modern
Period
From Montesquieu and Adam Smith we learn that economic
development depends on the form of government. The form of government
most conducive to economic growth is a government ruled by a
constitution that makes property secure and arbitrary confiscations
costly. Although such governments have been shown to have superior
growth records, despotic and autocratic regimes were the general
rule in early modern Europe. This article presents some evidence
of how stable political regimes could arise in early modern city-states.
The constitutional development in two of the famous Hansa cities
– Hamburg and Lübeck – is analysed. Hamburg arose from a minor
town to a major trading centre during the 16th century, while
Lübeck underwent a secular stagnation. It is argued that Hamburg’s
rise to prominence was the result of a constitutional development
that made it impossible for any group to monopolise the political
and economic powers in order to shift rents to their advantage.
In Lübeck, on the other hand, extensive economic privileges
were granted to a small circle of wealthy merchants and as a
result the city stagnated economically despite its close proximity
to the major markets in Western Europe. The article’s conclusions
confirm the claim made by classic political economists that the
economic growth rate – measured here as an increase of the urban
population – was more favourable in republican governments based
on political pluralism than in autocratic regimes.
Keywords
constitutions, Hansa, early modern, Hamburg, Lübeck, institutional
change, urban history
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|