Historisk tidskrift 124:1 • 2004
Innehåll (Contents) 2004:1
Uppsatser (Articles)
Mat och identitet? Livsmedel och livsmedelskonsumtion. Internationella
livsmedelsregimer och nationella/regionala reaktioner.
Ulf Jonsson
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Food and identity? Foodstuffs and Consumption. International
Agro-food Regimes and National/Regional Responses
Food is not only a question of nutrition but to a large extent
also of culture. Food preferences are constituted in long term
processes of interaction between forces of change and historically
and culturally formed preferences. Today countries and regions
are under the influence of the same global market forces and
the same global changes. However, homogenisation is far from
complete. The impulses of rapid and thorough transformation induced
by global market forces, market times, to use the conceptual
apparatus of the Italian agrarian economist Maria Fonte, are
countered by the force of tradition times, i e historically and
culturally constituted preferences. This article focuses on the
continuous co-existence of these forces in the European agro-food
system since the late nineteenth century.
In the first part the
concept of international agro-food regimes introduced by the
sociologists Philip McMichael and Harriet Friedmann is discussed.
A clearly increasing internal division of agricultural trade
from the 1870s and onwards did not result in a homogenisation
of European food consumption. On the contrary, we see the persistence
of patterns that had developed over a considerable period of
time.
The second part is concerned with a comparative study of
post-war Sweden and France. To a large extent, similar global
forces influence these societies. However, the response and the
reaction differ considerably. This is especially true regarding
the mounting critique of large-scale mass production and standardisation
of food. In Sweden concerns with health and ecology form the
core of the objections, while in France mass production is criticised
on gastronomic grounds.
The third part is an intensive case study
of gastronomic niche production in the French cheese industry.
The role of Products of Designated Origin, Appellation d´Origine
Controlée, AOC, is explored. This sector constitutes around 16
per cent of the French cheese production. To earn this label
an entrepreneur cannot produce outside a designated geographical
area and must adhere to specific methods of production. For most
AOC-cheeses raw milk is required. Thus, the AOC-label is not
a trademark and the property of an individual company. It belongs
to the producers of a specific area as collective good as long
as they adhere to the rules of the regulation. These cheeses
have achieved a solid reputation of authenticity and local specificity
in a world of increasing standardisation. These qualities are
becoming more and more of a global asset, that adds to the prestige
of French industry. At the same time, by imposing clearly defined
restrictions on the expansion of production, the AOC-system tends
to reduce the room of manoeuvre for the large companies and consequently
opens up a space for small-scale producers. Not that the really
important actors in French cheese industry are absent from this
niche, but the system creates conditions for a peaceful co-existence
between different actors. In a very subtle way the French cheese
industry illustrates how the continuous co-existence of market
times and tradition times is articulated in the present day global
agro-food system.
|