Historisk tidskrift 123:4 • 2003
Innehåll (Contents) 2003:4
Uppsatser (Articles)
Vänskap – hot eller skydd i medeltidens samhälle? En existentiell
och etisk historia.
Eva Österberg
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Friendship – Threat or Protection in Medieval Society? An
Existential/Ethical Turn in History
In the last decades, personal and informal relations such as
friendship, patronclient- relationships and social networks of
various kinds, have become increasingly popular topics for research
in both history and the social sciences. This article argues
that the reason for this is in part the distrust of modernity
and of the allegedly rational and formal organizations of modern
society that is part of our age. However, the renewed interest
in informal relations is also due to a creative scholarly exchange
between experts on pre- and early modern society, on the one
hand, and modern society, on the other. Medievalists and experts
in the seventeenth century, for example, have long been aware
of the important mechanisms involved in patronage and friendship.
Today scholars of modernity have also become fascinated by informal
relations in political, economic and social life.
Yet we still
lack an extensive history of friendship. Many questions remain
unanswered. Have the expressions and discourses of friendship
changed from the Middle Ages to the present, and if so: how?
Have people always seen friendship as protection, and as defence
against danger? To what extent has friendship also been perceived
as a threat to ideologies that have placed society, the group,
the community, or the party before the individual and his friend?
Drawing on international research and examples from the Icelandic
family sagas and medieval European religious authorities, this
article offers some interpretations and hypotheses in answer
to these questions. The learned discourse of the medieval churches
and monasteries was usually a development of concepts and definitions
from the classical era. The problem facing the participants in
this discourse was how to reconcile those ideas with the love
of God and with the ideal of monastic life. Friendship, in fact,
could be perceived as risky – it might undermine the general
solidarity of the monastic community or diminish the effort to
love God. In the Icelandic saga society, in contrast, people
were absolutely dependent on friendship to survive in armed conflict
or to avoid armed conflict through negotiated settlement. Kinship
was not enough, it had to be supported by friendship. Furthermore
not all kin were friendly. In fact friendship was often more
important than kinship. However, it was also dangerous. The bonds
of loyalty in the Icelandic sagas were very easily drowned in
blood. Here friendship is much more than pleasure and fun; friends
have to be loyal for the sake of their honour, even at the risk
of loosing their lives.
|
|