Historisk tidskrift 123:2 • 2003
Innehåll (Contents) 2003:2
Uppsatser (Articles)
Går det att skriva arbetarhistoriska synteser?
Lars Berggren
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Is it Possible to Write Syntheses of Labour History?
This article discusses the possibilities of writing a new synthesis
in the field of labour history. As a point of departure, I refer
to Eric Hobsbawm’s article from 1970, From Social History to
the History of the Society, in which he asserts that history
of societies should require the researcher to apply an assumption
about the central nexus of the subject under study. A generation
of Swedish labour historians starting their research in the 1970s
and 1980s did have the ambition to write the history of society.
This generation was inspired by Eric Hobsbawm and E P Thompson.
The labour historians in Sweden produced several dissertations
on local workplaces and trade unions. Theoretically many of them
positioned themselves as historical materialists, sometimes with
reference to Harry Braverman’s studies of labour processes. Though
quite a lot of results were produced, there were some shortcomings
and there were no real efforts to systematise the results.
With
reference to Jürgen Kocka, I discuss the importance of the challenge
represented by gender history, the linguistic turn and historians
advocating putting politics back in. By constructively meeting
those challenges, a new synthesis could be built using the different
results presented within the field of labour history since the
1960s. However, it is necessary to do this from a theoretical
perspective. As we lack research on important issues, this is
not an easy task. However, the need for further research within
fields identified in the synthesis- writing process will become
evident.
One conclusion is that a synthesis systematically should
involve the concepts of class, gender, ethnicity and generation.
|