Historisk tidskrift 122:2 • 2002
Innehåll (Contents) 2002:2
Uppsatser (Articles)
Historiekultur, politik och historievetenskap i Norden
Peter Aronsson
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
The Culture of History, Politics and Disciplines
of History in Scandinavia
Developments within science and contemporary history have
led to an increased interest in how history is created in other
arenas than the scientific. This article suggest that such
concepts as culture of history, the uses of history and historical
consciousness are just as potentially important concepts in
historiography as are the social, culture, mentality, and gender
in terms of their potential for changing the perspective of
research.
The culture of history consists of the artefacts, rituals,
customs and assertions with references to the past, which allow
us to link the relationship between the past, present and future.
Occ asionally they are direct and explicit interpretations
of this link. The Uses of History consists of the processes
where parts of the culture of history are activated to form
definite opinions and action-oriented totalities. Historical
consciousness consists of those views of the link between the
past, present and future which steer the use of history and
which are established and are reproduced in its use. A certain
selection of the culture of history is activated as communities
of memory in the use of history and forms an historical consciousness.
The concept of the historical categories space of experiences
and horizon of expectations fit well into this framework. Knowledge
of and descriptions of the past create opportunities for certain
assumptions of the future. The hopes and fears created by images
of the future in the present influence the way the relationship
between memory and that which is forgotten is organised in
the spaces of experience. The uses of history occur in the
dynamic process that links the spaces of experience and horizon
of expectations in a specific situation.
Some strategic research considerations are also discussed:
1. The contemporary division of labour between scientific
disciplines, private
and commercial interests, institutions of education, and authorities
responsible for promoting culture are restructured at the turn
of the twentieth century in a way similar to the changes at
the turn of the nineteenth century.
2. The need for comparative and non-national perspectives
is necessary to counter the subject’s inherent national bias.
3. We know more about public practices than we do about private
ones, more about the producer’s intentions than the users reception
and reuse, more about the cognitive aspects than the existential
functions where the aesthetic and affective values are added.
4. A well defined classification of the function of the uses
of history should be used with care since the strongest aspect
of the communities of memory is the combination of simplified
stereotypes, narrative trope, metaphors, and ideals of taste
that make it possible to link several uses with open or associative
techniques.
|