Historisk tidskrift 130:4 • 2010
Innehåll (Contents) 2010:4
Uppsatser (Articles)
Globalhistoria och forskning om långa förlopp
Av Arne Jarrick & Janken Myrdal
Fulltext (pdf)
Summary
Global history and the longue durée
The mission of this article is to advocate, define, explain,
and offer some empirical examples of global history. The advocacy
follows two lines. First, since human affairs have gradually
turned global, in the moral and ideological sense as much as
in economic life, historians should refashion their scientific
endeavours from the national to the global. Second, provided
that historians still wish to explain the destiny of humankind
and not only describe it as faithfully as possible, they simply
have to break out of the methodological and thematic nationalism
that has been the hallmark of their enterprise for too long.
And explaining human history requires that global and secular
processes are addressed in concert. Applying a long-term global
perspective may enable us to realize the significance of slow
and rapid diffusion of profound human cultural phenomena, and
to distinguish such processes from locally produced cultural
traits.
Aiming at uncovering and explaining general patterns
of human history by studying global processes over the very
long run, implies that history cannot be seen as contingent,
but, basically, as a process with a certain course, and that
history will never recommence where it once started.
Against
this backdrop the question whether the trajectory of human
history resembles an evolutionary process is discussed but
not conclusively settled. On the one hand, since our history
is a process of slowly emerging and waning forms of social
life, where certain traits are selected at the expense of others,
it does resemble an evolutionary process. On the other hand,
since the destiny of mankind is to a substantial degree the
outcome of deliberate human choice, self-reflection and, therefore,
of agency exceeding pure behaviour, it does not.
In the concluding
section two examples are presented of what could be accomplished
by a global and secular approach to history: the history of
empires, and the history of law codes. Aside from the substantive
matters themselves, a couple of methodological issues, peculiar
to global history, are addressed.
Keywords
Global history, empires, law codes, source criticism
|
|